From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756229Ab3AROxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:53:35 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:58235 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753930Ab3AROxd (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:53:33 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 50/76] ARC: SMP support Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:53:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.7.0-7-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Rajeshwar Ranga , Noam Camus , "Gilad Ben-Yossef" References: <1358511930-7424-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1358511930-7424-51-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> In-Reply-To: <1358511930-7424-51-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201301181453.29243.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:MG0fBp9rJ+CrXMm1oX8wkiqM9vHhFIrdEd50pecicin PLnxyy2wHnyZUvs6yvO6Vpcrk7L2/53d76vdeFrtm0q10xh5Nn Gkk2WOkk7rOBxLLgY765vFkOjJI74k/gTV3vgfl7lZRkpD/1cV lovdkUz38laHiTo88rDYmwIVBb/thA9IHxHOuOJJ/KEus80bcd lyeFc9ZhFywxL8VRCoI85DsKbq7tLSqgTizMJVlG7AiXLDH9nx lwuaLdrSOb1DrxS79ea3BfBYzDe/KIGlzbKmoChib/S8bbVa2Q IN+xszMJx5LNvY+BYrs14bgJzPsVOfmnlY7uVSQkyM4Bn0wu0I IuAULj6TeMAkI0wlklxg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 18 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote: > +# If a plat can do IPI, same core(s) can do minimal SMP > +config ARC_HAS_IPI > + bool > + I think it would be better to turn the logic around here, otherwise you get into trouble when enabling multiple platforms, out of which some have IPI support and others don't. Instead, you can mark the platforms that lack IPI support (or multiple CPUs) as 'depends on !SMP'. Arnd