From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752645Ab3AVNKN (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:10:13 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:57314 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751726Ab3AVNKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:10:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:09:57 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, w.sang@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/33] net: Convert to devm_ioremap_resource() Message-ID: <20130122130957.GA18165@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> References: <1358762966-20791-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20130121.152913.1377695352860141642.davem@davemloft.net> <20130122065629.GA14523@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <201301221303.06785.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201301221303.06785.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:TJW2Lc1Xue9A5ULVEbaUuCx57Vz24L93SNOeAumQWgj r+zBkDh5EuANs5XS2+LwGm5ZKq2RpanSyFu7fOyrMVnisfl/6M hhyias/mmkgrA5Ub8/hrEF4MWRcfOFLQa4Sjdz7kVTtXK7S9El wTRl0rEz17jjngjVK+Sywx6jfC3uaHlBpbdDmM+PJYGDpCb+Ui zvwCdpJH63jwJ0U24/4gAKa0e/3Si0VWie2UrccRaGvfSKvtSP jYIdxAUmqorVnD7NoEU8ghSxZ7JYQm0EmLPGHEQymx+jxXTXe1 7sdAD9/i4OqEN7vCD3hbsSbLlUGxBK24xXnh25pBKwrls6hfD2 CVb75nDegLHTW326C9LPMssmKzCaHSFxK9axk5K61mKn+W3coD 4VYfumVhuruK4RHpSM/oKMhjLSfPLm/bBNczD1GEc7eCDGlli/ KsFbH Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > > I planned to do so initially, but that yielded a Cc list of 156 people > > and mailing lists, which I thought wasn't going to go down so well > > either. In general I like Cc'ing everyone concerned on all patches of > > the series, specifically for reasons of context. Some people have been > > annoyed when I did so. Still, for small series where only a few dozen > > people are concerned that seems to me to be the best way. But 156 email > > addresses is a different story. > >=20 > > Either you add to many people or you don't add enough. Where do we draw > > the line? >=20 > I've had the same problem a couple of times. The best compromise seems > to be to Cc only the top-level subsystem maintainers and mailing lists > on the first email. Even that would have been about 50 addresses IIRC. But perhaps that's still the best compromise to avoid any confusion. Thierry --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/o+lAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhkwEP/ixTv70eEqwHXX28nnkbRwqv uZFK5yqSiHJGlLIxyE7SeVPluQTt7ZLKrf6Zc/xhztHQ8FrRvLPvyqMoZuxOHDyQ jZITotuDlJKXZG128W/x+avJlIgq5Lmai2KoHp21QcBRkQyxTKgD+0zosAHk26BM oemmTTzagN87xnARIgsGteXCuGk2qag7Qwaht/yU1KuBH0IomIHc1yQW/cvDGQ8y aBmtp6ILsPZgRvrRfoD0ZtlixEw1tvkgU8YNizjsBZXHmXNUvNGeu9S1m71HtYN2 EZsDQvSjIOC9+d69eVp8PU4KFcQbeltmT9RTKbYuTBLXcMWlyJc6d5nTkYBtz51e bIrxYqtikLMr9C7UNF5FtX0c6xeRWnfVRTtAff/iqo9GxnSWcQsTMJPCMNsON9Da TIbGnzsfE/9c5i4oaqUcDoU21sD6Bweu6DPrP5RZYjApc0fTDbnSnmif6IRpoKhc UE3pod75SRpxzks1p+W7hT/h4jYd+MWKRmh0IrMlHPMkr7RySBOynZtF6pbxwkAM hVsC5qiZCPSl+6MyAfvThNNsyUkQ6eAxmgmN9OPNU6tUCu2DSrQqNIeuKIZKMiXj I8+TcQlnJGGPQ5hFO+0Cjv2YPUUcNm1o2ndfb6FGPn3jm5UjBg3aLZYE0f7NXZQM OnOHtzS8qS4Vdu2ElBnV =b4+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--