From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755357Ab3AVSrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:47:00 -0500 Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.21]:54613 "EHLO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754041Ab3AVSq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:46:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:46:34 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Stephen Warren Cc: Hiroshi Doyu , Russell King , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "santosh.shilimkar@ti.com" , "olof@lixom.net" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [v3 2/2] ARM: tegra: Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if not Cortex A9 Message-ID: <20130122184633.GI2153@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1358833924-24535-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1358833924-24535-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <50FEDC0B.7050604@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50FEDC0B.7050604@wwwdotorg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephan, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:35:55PM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/21/2013 10:52 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if CPU is not Cortex A9 with SCU. > > Will, is your for-next/perf branch stable; can I pull it into a branch > destined for arm-soc? Background below: I'm going to send a pull request to Russell tomorrow using my for-rmk/perf branch, so *that* is stable. You might, however, want to wait for Russell to push that out because it's also needed for kvm and, as such, will need to be published anyway. Sound ok? Will