From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: xufengzhang.main@gmail.com
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, sri@us.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: set association state to established in dupcook_a handler
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:46:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123134650.GA3512@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358926720-25557-1-git-send-email-xufengzhang.main@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:38:40PM +0800, xufengzhang.main@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
>
> While sctp handling a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO and the action is
> 'Association restart', sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a() will processing
> the unexpected COOKIE-ECHO for peer restart, but it does not set
> the association state to SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED, so the association
> could stuck in SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING state forever.
> This violates the sctp specification:
> RFC 4960 5.2.4. Handle a COOKIE ECHO when a TCB Exists
> Action
> A) In this case, the peer may have restarted. .....
> After this, the endpoint shall enter the ESTABLISHED state.
>
> Fix this problem by adding a SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE cmd to the command
> list so as to set the restart association to SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED
> state properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 618ec7e..528f1c8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -1779,6 +1779,8 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a(struct net *net,
>
> /* Update the content of current association. */
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_ASSOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc));
> + sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE,
> + SCTP_STATE(SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED));
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(repl));
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_EVENT_ULP, SCTP_ULPEVENT(ev));
> return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME;
> --
> 1.7.0.2
>
>
Looks reasonable to me, thanks
nit: The RFC indicate the association should enter the ESTABLISHED state after
preforming all other actions, so it seems that the state change should occur
after the ULP event is sent
Neil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 7:38 xufengzhang.main
2013-01-23 13:46 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2013-01-23 14:22 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-01-24 1:36 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-01-24 1:34 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-06-03 7:52 Xufeng Zhang
2013-06-03 14:28 ` Greg KH
2013-06-04 2:00 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-06-05 0:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-05 2:20 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-06-05 2:55 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-06-07 10:39 ` Xufeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130123134650.GA3512@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=xufengzhang.main@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®