From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754128Ab3AXSPk (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:15:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]:52999 "EHLO mail-pb0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751902Ab3AXSPj (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:15:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:15:35 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Robin Holt Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How should I proceed to get commit 891348c to 3.0.y? Message-ID: <20130124181535.GB12106@kroah.com> References: <20130124152851.GF3460@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130124152851.GF3460@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:28:51AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > I missed the email from 12/31 indicating commit 891348c was pulled from > the 3.0.y stable tree due to a build breakage. > > That commit requires the enum defined in traps.h by commit c940826. That, > in turn depends on commit 228bdaa95f which depends upon earlier commits. > > How should I proceed? Should I give you a patch that uses the constants > in xpc_main.c? Should I add a patch which just pulls the enum portion of > commit c940826 into traps.h? Any other direction you think this should go? I think the last one makes the most sense as that makes it all self-contained and sensible, right? thanks, greg k-h