mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmatouse@redhat.com,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
	linux-scsi@kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for multimedia devices
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:28:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125172805.GG3081@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5102BDD4.2020501@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:16:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Well, you can find broken devices for pretty much every command in the
> list.  Anyhow, the other two commands are obsolete so I'm okay with
> leaving them out, if only for the sake of avoiding useless email threads.

Once we open the commands to userland this way, it's difficult to
throttle it back again.  I just fail to see the point of allowing
everything possible.  There's a way to override it (is that in yet?)
and we can always extend the list later, so please do the minimal set
with justification and can you please stop labeling reviews as
"useless"?  For Pete's sake, if you disagree, just disagree and
explain your point.  How is discussion about which commands should be
allowed via SG_IO "useless"?  Gees...

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-24 15:00 [PATCH 00/13] Corrections and customization of the SG_IO command whitelist (CVE-2012-4542) Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 01/13] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 22:34   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 02/13] sg_io: reorganize list of allowed commands Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 22:42   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 22:49     ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 22:58       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 10:01         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 17:13           ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 17:26             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 03/13] sg_io: use different default filters for each device class Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 04/13] sg_io: resolve conflicts between commands assigned to multiple classes (CVE-2012-4542) Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 05/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for rare & obsolete device types Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 06/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for multimedia devices Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 22:55   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25  9:26     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 17:04       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 17:16         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 17:28           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-25 17:57             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 18:13               ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 18:47                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 19:01                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 22:32                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 22:41                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 23:32                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-25 23:47                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-26 10:18                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 07/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for media changers Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 08/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for tapes Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 09/13] sg_io: whitelist a few more commands for disks Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 10/13] sg_io: whitelist a few obsolete commands Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 11/13] sg_io: add list of commands that were in the consulted list but are disabled Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 12/13] sg_io: remove remnants of sysfs SG_IO filters Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 13/13] sg_io: introduce unpriv_sgio queue flag Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130125172805.GG3081@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmatouse@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®