From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755480Ab3A1XLW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:11:22 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43070 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908Ab3A1XLU (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:11:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:11:19 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Petr Holasek , Andrea Arcangeli , Izik Eidus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11] ksm: trivial tidyups Message-Id: <20130128151119.b74d0150.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:58:11 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > +#define NUMA(x) (x) > +#define DO_NUMA(x) (x) Did we consider #define DO_NUMA do { (x) } while (0) ? That could avoid some nasty config-dependent compilation issues. > +#else > +#define NUMA(x) (0) > +#define DO_NUMA(x) do { } while (0) > +#endif