From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756103Ab3BEPwX (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:52:23 -0500 Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:23789 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754742Ab3BEPwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:52:19 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 72.84.113.162 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/58j0IdD1dXxRJegnBC6j89U3nyheQwqA= Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:52:14 -0500 From: Jason Cooper To: Thierry Reding Cc: Andrew Lunn , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Kirkwood: Add missing linux/i2c.h include Message-ID: <20130205155214.GW14746@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1360077025-8046-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20130205153411.GV14746@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20130205153807.GA22220@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130205153807.GA22220@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:34:11AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Thierry, > > > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:10:25PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > The nsa310 board uses I2C_BOARD_INFO and i2c_register_board_info(), both > > > of which are defined in the linux/i2c.h header file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/board-nsa310.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > What is this based against? We're in the process of removing this whole > > file for v3.9 (pinctrl, mv643xx_eth, and i2c)... > > It's based on today's linux-next, so if you're going to drop that file > for 3.9 I guess you can ignore the patch. ok, thanks. Jason. > > Thierry