From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932636Ab3BJCmT (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:42:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:58147 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760950Ab3BJCmR (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:42:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:42:19 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren , Anmar Oueja , Lee Jones , arm@kernel.org, Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] ARM: ux500: remove irq_base property from platform_data Message-ID: <20130210024141.GE25302@quad.lixom.net> References: <1360093715-6348-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <1360093715-6348-12-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1360093715-6348-12-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:48:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > From: Lee Jones > > AB8500 GPIO no longer handles its GPIO IRQs. Instead, the AB8500 > core driver has taken back the responsibility. Prior to this > happening, the AB8500 GPIO driver provided a set of virtual IRQs > which were used as a pass-through. These virtual IRQs had a base > of MOP500_AB8500_VIR_GPIO_IRQ_BASE, which was passed though pdata. > We don't need to do this anymore, so we're pulling out the > property from the structure. > > Cc: arm@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > Requesting an ACK from the ARM SoC maintainers on this patch. This patch on its own doesn't apply cleanly at all to arm-soc, I'm guessing because I need the rest of the series. With the presumption that you're not going to cause grief from sfr due to excessive conflicts. I.e. please try merging with arm-soc for-next to see how bad it is: patch 11-14: Acked-by: Olof Johansson If it's conflict-heavy, we'll stage a topic branch that we can both pull in. I'm guessing/hoping that won't be the case though. -Olof