From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932952Ab3BLBYQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:24:16 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:30497 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932675Ab3BLBYP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:24:15 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,646,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="255680942" Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:24:13 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Zach Brown , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH][WIP] dio rewrite Message-ID: <20130212012413.GA30387@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20130212005326.GA6592@moria.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130212005326.GA6592@moria.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:53:26PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > I finally started hacking on the dio code, and it's far from done but > it's turning out better than I expected so I thought I'd show off what > I've got so far. The critical metric for some of the highend workloads is the number of cache lines touched in the submission path (especially potentially modified ones). How does your new code fare on that? -Andi