mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Fix locking when calling of_get_next_available_child()
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:20:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212152037.GA21685@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51197E36.8080704@wwwdotorg.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:26:46PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 03:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > of_get_next_available_child() obtains the devtree_lock and then calls
> > of_device_is_available() which also attempts to claim the lock. This is
> > obviously incorrect and causes a deadlock on boot. Fix issue by adding
> > an variant of of_device_is_available() which doesn't obtain the lock.
> 
> This patch forgets to update __of_device_is_available() to call
> __of_get_property() rather than of_get_property() and hence doesn't
> actually solve the problem.

Yes, please. of_get_property() called from __of_device_is_available()
pretty much defeats the purpose of having the non-locked version.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11 22:19 Grant Likely
2013-02-11 22:27 ` Rob Herring
2013-02-11 22:30   ` Grant Likely
2013-02-11 23:26 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-12 15:20   ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-02-13 10:08   ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130212152037.GA21685@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de \
    --to=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome