From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934608Ab3BNO0l (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:26:41 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:50697 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933991Ab3BNO0k (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:26:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:26:35 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix invocation of restore_altstack Message-ID: <20130214142635.GT4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20130214133552.GB25537@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130214133552.GB25537@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:35:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed the following issue while attempting to build an arm64 kernel from > next-20130214, and it still seems to be present in signal/for-next and > signal/arch-arm64. > > It looks to be a trivial typo. Thanks; folded and pushed.