From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756801Ab3BQW6x (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:58:53 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:45816 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755217Ab3BQWzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:55:44 -0500 Message-Id: <20130217225005.475331641@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:34 +0000 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Oleg Nesterov , Srikar Dronamraju Subject: [ 33/66] ptrace/x86: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper In-Reply-To: <20130217225001.621306883@decadent.org.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:a11:96ff:fec6:70c4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Oleg Nesterov commit 848e8f5f0ad3169560c516fff6471be65f76e69f upstream. No functional changes, preparation for the next fix and for uprobes single-step fixes. Move the code playing with TIF_BLOCKSTEP/DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF into the new helper, set_task_blockstep(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- arch/x86/kernel/step.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c index c346d11..7a51498 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c @@ -157,6 +157,21 @@ static int enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child) return 1; } +static void set_task_blockstep(struct task_struct *task, bool on) +{ + unsigned long debugctl; + + debugctl = get_debugctlmsr(); + if (on) { + debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF; + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP); + } else { + debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF; + clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP); + } + update_debugctlmsr(debugctl); +} + /* * Enable single or block step. */ @@ -169,19 +184,10 @@ static void enable_step(struct task_struct *child, bool block) * So no one should try to use debugger block stepping in a program * that uses user-mode single stepping itself. */ - if (enable_single_step(child) && block) { - unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr(); - - debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF; - update_debugctlmsr(debugctl); - set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP); - } else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) { - unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr(); - - debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF; - update_debugctlmsr(debugctl); - clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP); - } + if (enable_single_step(child) && block) + set_task_blockstep(child, true); + else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) + set_task_blockstep(child, false); } void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child) @@ -199,13 +205,8 @@ void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *child) /* * Make sure block stepping (BTF) is disabled. */ - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) { - unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr(); - - debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF; - update_debugctlmsr(debugctl); - clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP); - } + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) + set_task_blockstep(child, false); /* Always clear TIF_SINGLESTEP... */ clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SINGLESTEP);