From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation"
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:49:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218084937.GC15989@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzTR5nBLXHe4MKtN6E7xrs3=xsbMd1aprr8Ax4mu96onw@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Right, that's the commit causing the x86 regression:
> >
> > c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e is the first bad commit
> > commit c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e
> > Date: Fri Jan 11 14:31:51 2013 -0800
> >
> > mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation
>
> Ok, looking more at this, I don't really want to revert it,
> and I have an idea of what is wrong.
>
> When we allocate the zone use bitmap, we do not take the
> zone_start_pfn into account. So I *think* that what happens is
> that "pfn_to_bitidx()" simply overruns the allocation for
> unaligned zonesm and the spinlock just happens to be right
> after (or the overrun causes some other memory corruption that
> then indirectly causes the spinlock corruption).
>
> So I'm wondering if the fix is simply something like the
> attached patch. It takes the zone_start_pfn into account when
> allocating the zone bitmap.
>
> Laura? Mel?
>
> Ingo, can you test this? I was going to do the 3.8 today, but
> I guess I can just wait, and if you can test this we could get
> it in..
Yes, your patch fixes the bug: with the patch applied to
f741656d646f plus the failing .config the system booted up
just fine.
I also double checked that vanilla upstream f741656d646f still
locks up - so it's your patch that made the difference.
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 21:51 Linux v3.8-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2013-02-10 0:14 ` [REGRESSION] -rc7/-rc4+: unable to USB boot - enumeration partially broken (was: Linux v3.8-rc7) Andreas Mohr
2013-02-10 14:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:07 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:16 ` Greg KH
2013-02-12 21:25 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 6:44 ` [REGRESSION] [nailed] USB boot failure: USB: EHCI: make ehci-pci a separate driver Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 7:16 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 7:44 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:50 ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 16:13 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 16:26 ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 11:10 ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Ingo Molnar
2013-02-13 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 23:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 15:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 17:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 18:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-15 11:44 ` [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation" Ingo Molnar
2013-02-15 22:06 ` Greg KH
2013-02-16 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 16:50 ` Greg KH
2013-03-01 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 17:14 ` Greg KH
2013-02-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-16 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-16 19:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-16 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-18 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-02-18 14:46 ` Mel Gorman
2013-02-18 18:42 ` Laura Abbott
2013-02-14 23:05 ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Linus Torvalds
2013-02-15 11:39 ` [PATCH] spinlock/debugging: Print out lock name when available Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130218084937.GC15989@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome