mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation"
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:49:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218084937.GC15989@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzTR5nBLXHe4MKtN6E7xrs3=xsbMd1aprr8Ax4mu96onw@mail.gmail.com>


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > Right, that's the commit causing the x86 regression:
> >
> >  c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e is the first bad commit
> >  commit c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e
> >  Date:   Fri Jan 11 14:31:51 2013 -0800
> >
> >      mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation
> 
> Ok, looking more at this, I don't really want to revert it, 
> and I have an idea of what is wrong.
> 
> When we allocate the zone use bitmap, we do not take the 
> zone_start_pfn into account. So I *think* that what happens is 
> that "pfn_to_bitidx()" simply overruns the allocation for 
> unaligned zonesm and the spinlock just happens to be right 
> after (or the overrun causes some other memory corruption that 
> then indirectly causes the spinlock corruption).
> 
> So I'm wondering if the fix is simply something like the 
> attached patch. It takes the zone_start_pfn into account when 
> allocating the zone bitmap.
> 
> Laura? Mel?
> 
> Ingo, can you test this? I was going to do the 3.8 today, but 
> I guess I can just wait, and if you can test this we could get 
> it in..

Yes, your patch fixes the bug: with the patch applied to 
f741656d646f plus the failing .config the system booted up
just fine.

I also double checked that vanilla upstream f741656d646f still 
locks up - so it's your patch that made the difference.

Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-18  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-08 21:51 Linux v3.8-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2013-02-10  0:14 ` [REGRESSION] -rc7/-rc4+: unable to USB boot - enumeration partially broken (was: Linux v3.8-rc7) Andreas Mohr
2013-02-10 14:05   ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:07     ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:16       ` Greg KH
2013-02-12 21:25         ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13  6:44         ` [REGRESSION] [nailed] USB boot failure: USB: EHCI: make ehci-pci a separate driver Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13  7:16           ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13  7:44             ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:05               ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:50                 ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 16:13                   ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 16:26                     ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 11:10 ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Ingo Molnar
2013-02-13 16:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 23:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 14:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 14:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 15:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 17:28             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 18:22             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-15 11:44               ` [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation" Ingo Molnar
2013-02-15 22:06                 ` Greg KH
2013-02-16  8:29                   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 16:50                     ` Greg KH
2013-03-01 17:07                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 17:14                         ` Greg KH
2013-02-16  8:25                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-16 18:26                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-16 19:38                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-16 19:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-18  8:49                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-02-18 14:46                   ` Mel Gorman
2013-02-18 18:42                     ` Laura Abbott
2013-02-14 23:05   ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Linus Torvalds
2013-02-15 11:39     ` [PATCH] spinlock/debugging: Print out lock name when available Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130218084937.GC15989@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome