From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932596Ab3BSL74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:59:56 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51786 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202Ab3BSL7z (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:59:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:59:51 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Rusty Russell Cc: LKML , Borislav Petkov , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] param, charp: Cache val length Message-ID: <20130219115951.GB26623@pd.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Rusty Russell , LKML , Borislav Petkov , Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <1361178750-17915-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <87txp9j255.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txp9j255.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:54:22PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > I'm delighted with your enthusiasm for making trivial changes, Who says I'm enthusiastic about it? > but I have trouble sharing in it. I just assumed that noodling for a second time over a string of possible length of 1024 chars (I know, I know, we will never have params of that length, yadda yadda...) should be avoided. Nevermind. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --