From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf x86: Change SandyBridge and IvyBrige instructions event to be precise
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:18:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130220211819.GA14253@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ppzuyaao.fsf@firstfloor.org>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:55:59PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Changing the default 'instructions' HW event for SandyBridge and
> > IvyBrige to use the available precise 'instructions' event.
> >
> > The precise event is defined in Intel SDM as:
> >
> > INST_RETIRED.ALL - Precise instruction retired event with HW to
> > reduce effect of PEBS shadow in IP distribution
> >
> > for both SandyBridge and IvyBrige micro-archs. It allows to use
> > precise modifier on 'instructions' event on SandyBridge and
> > IvyBrige micro-archs which is not possible now.
>
> Actually it's possible, you just have to use it explicitely.
>
> This will break a lot of profiling setups that assume instructions
> count on the fixed counter and use the 4/8 other counters.
> Also it will give very bad results with perf stat, which
> you don't want to run with pebs.
right, I haven't realized that..
>
> Even worse with your change the fixed instruction counter is not
> accessible anymore. So pretty much all the standard setups
still could be used explicitly via cpu/event=0xc0/
> that collect it in addition to other events and fill all
> the counters would break.
>
> I don't think it should be done by default, but yes explicitely
> it's quite useful.
>
> My Haswell patchkit (in the "extended version") exposes
> the precise event as "instructions-p" through sysfs.
will check
thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 20:39 Jiri Olsa
2013-02-20 20:55 ` Andi Kleen
2013-02-20 21:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-20 21:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-20 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2013-02-20 21:18 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130220211819.GA14253@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®