From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759064Ab3BYV2b (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:28:31 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41244 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754479Ab3BYV22 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:28:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:28:27 -0800 From: Mark Fasheh To: Al Viro Cc: Richard Weinberger , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, ocfs2-user@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at Subject: Re: OCFS2 mainline state? Message-ID: <20130225212827.GC13510@wotan.suse.de> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <512BCA9E.4090702@nod.at> <20130225211103.GA13510@wotan.suse.de> <20130225211617.GF4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130225211617.GF4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Organization: SUSE Labs User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:16:18PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline > > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the > > patches for us right now). > > > > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today. > > Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus... Or I can pick that patch via > VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow). There also had been Jan's ocfs2 > patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and > IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees. Should I just pick > the ocfs2 stuff from now on? I personally would absolutely be fine (and grateful) with you picking up the Ocfs2 stuff. --Mark