From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759675Ab3BZDzn (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:55:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:42924 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756212Ab3BZDzm (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:55:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:55:38 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Binghua Duan Subject: Re: what's the next LTSI kernel version for long-term support Message-ID: <20130226035538.GB1128@kroah.com> References: <20130226033524.GA25067@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:46:04AM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > 2013/2/26 Greg Kroah-Hartman : > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:06:56AM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > >> Hi Greg/All, > >> we have seen 3.4 was announced to be an LTSI in Aug, 2012. I'd like to > >> know what is the next LTSI version since we might want to align our > >> next release with LTSI. > > > > Who is "we" here? > > > people. I don't take anonymous "we want this" requests serious at all, sorry. Please provide details as you are asking me to do work for you, right? greg k-h