From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
efault@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:13:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130227161326.GA25559@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBsk9s-w0A-uMMJuHY=_1y8WhdkArRxN=Jk0qtQwPZyDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:28:26AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Ok I don't like having a per cpu state in struct sched domain but for
> > now I can't find anything better. So my suggestion is that we do this
> > and describe well the race, define the issue in the changelog and code
> > comments and explain how we are solving it. This way at least the
> > issue is identified and known. Then later, on review or after the
> > patch is upstream, if somebody with some good taste comes with a
> > better idea, we consider it.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I don't have better solution than adding this state in the
> sched_domain if we want to keep the exact same behavior. This will be
> a bit of waste of mem because we don't need to update all sched_domain
> level (1st level is enough).
Or you can try something like the below. Both flags and sched_domain share the same
object here so the same RCU lifecycle. And there shouldn't be more overhead there
since accessing rq->sd_rq.sd is the same than rq->sd_rq in the ASM level: only
one pointer to dereference.
Also rq_idle becomes a separate value from rq->nohz_flags. It's a simple boolean
(just making it an int here because boolean size are a bit opaque, although they
are supposed to be char, let's just avoid surprises in structures).
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index cc03cfd..16c0d55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -417,7 +417,10 @@ struct rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct root_domain *rd;
- struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_domain_rq {
+ struct sched_domain sd;
+ int rq_idle;
+ } __rcu *sd_rq;
unsigned long cpu_power;
@@ -505,9 +508,14 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \
- rcu_dereference_check((p), \
- lockdep_is_held(&sched_domains_mutex))
+#define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) ({\
+ struct sched_domain_rq *__sd_rq = rcu_dereference_check((p), \
+ lockdep_is_held(&sched_domains_mutex)); \
+ if (!__sd_rq) \
+ NULL; \
+ else \
+ &__sd_rq->sd; \
+})
/*
* The domain tree (rq->sd) is protected by RCU's quiescent state transition.
@@ -517,7 +525,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
* preempt-disabled sections.
*/
#define for_each_domain(cpu, __sd) \
- for (__sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd); \
+ for (__sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd_rq); \
__sd; __sd = __sd->parent)
#define for_each_lower_domain(sd) for (; sd; sd = sd->child)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 8:29 Vincent Guittot
2013-02-22 12:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-22 13:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-02-26 13:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-26 16:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-02-26 17:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-02-27 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-02-27 16:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-02-27 16:45 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130227161326.GA25559@somewhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®