From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758641Ab3CDRib (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:38:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:64401 "EHLO mail-pb0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757390Ab3CDRi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:38:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:38:25 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Li Zefan Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Cgroups Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: add cgroup_name() API Message-ID: <20130304173825.GC30413@htj.dyndns.org> References: <512C8D84.7090707@huawei.com> <512DE4A8.5050303@huawei.com> <512EFEDF.8080205@huawei.com> <51304C6D.8050207@huawei.com> <20130301203917.GT4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <51340ECD.1030905@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51340ECD.1030905@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:02:37AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > > Yeah, that's what I meant by the "anal" part although it seems like > > c99 doesn't even allow that. Do we care tho? It seems like a logical > > feature which should show up in the standard eventually. Maybe it > > could be a problem for clang? > > > > Do we have a decision now? Please pick v4 if this GNU extension can't be used > in kernel code, otherwise v5. I'm just gonna apply the one with the initializer. It's simpler and not like we can't back out easily if it ever becomes a problem. Thanks. -- tejun