From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ARM SoC <arm@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/3] arm-soc: late changes for 3.9
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:14:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201303042114.49096.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFx2Cuuq2YW6mexxZ88TNm=FLYUYPzeLqN=y46oYxZJ3wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 01 March 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > Final two pull requests are for the same code. As Arnd describes in the
> > tags, they are for a set of mvebu patches that depend on contents in
> > the MMC tree. We had pulled in part of the MMC branch as a dependency,
> > but unfortunately Chris Ball rebased it.
>
> Has Chris Ball been told what an incredible pain this kind of crap is,
> and that there's a damn good reason why WE DO NOT REBASE PUBLIC TREES
> THAT OTHERS MAY BE BASING THEIR DEVELOPMENT ON!
>
> Chris, can you hear me shouting? Don't do that.
I talked to Chris while I prepared the two branches, and he now understands
the consequences and won't do it again.
I also talked to Jason Cooper about it and he is going to do his branches
differently now to avoid building deep dependency chains on other trees.
We've had similar problems with other subsystem maintainers before, but
there are a lot more subsystems that one can depend on. We generally
try to do the branches in a way that we can drop a small part of the stuff
in arm-soc without rebasing when someone else screws up, but that did not
happen in this case.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 22:54 Olof Johansson
2013-02-28 22:54 ` [GIT PULL 1/3] arm-soc: i.MX DT changes Olof Johansson
2013-02-28 22:54 ` [GIT PULL 2/3] arm-soc: late OMAP changes Olof Johansson
2013-02-28 22:54 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] arm-soc: mvebu platform changes (not rebased) Olof Johansson
2013-02-28 22:54 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] arm-soc: mvebu platform changes (rebased) Olof Johansson
2013-03-01 4:18 ` [GIT PULL 0/3] arm-soc: late changes for 3.9 Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 6:19 ` Olof Johansson
2013-03-04 21:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201303042114.49096.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome