From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756329Ab3CEWes (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:34:48 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:64465 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756233Ab3CEWeq (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:34:46 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 22:34:32 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-8-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Stephen Boyd , Stephen Warren , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Srinidhi Kasagar , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Barry Song , Olof Johansson References: <1362007694-3419-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <512E9A39.3070207@wwwdotorg.org> <51354E35.1080804@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <51354E35.1080804@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303052234.32723.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:vQoTZYx2DzkpBYahKlTA9xKA66oQdVWlURc4tZ+gfNk XXUV3qhm7r1eOLvgx37NpBshAJHLUVHYYmgy9UMVFfOcfX7Q0R AvwHstNPw6OixboZ4H6fkJYSEHKc8rIY/0sCJzPSqfdTq5CIQ/ 0G6sKUYGzAurA3HaF0FL2GJNPwJ3E65AUDTTuG02YY32gqijpV qU5/5/hXfoLqPlXvzNiy/9LFB+WmdN0zOiUnz8Wz0XysHI/43P Mfip0uRx73FyWwXR0+0iQi6V9qgDLXs2j9q6T20TjIVU4Ei2Er Cp4epmhcv/aFCocZTItJSIjMn391as/6dQD5Xe7RjEXlhYh1sk tEif41UKbR3IojTnb3OI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra, > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren > > > > Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted > > to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block > > from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I > > suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other > > multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like > > that though. > > Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which > version it will go into. > Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land in 3.10 as well. Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us, but it doesn't feel right. Arnd