From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756085Ab3CHT64 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:58:56 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:32842 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264Ab3CHT6z (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:58:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:58:39 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Douglas Gilbert Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] [SCSI] scsi_transport_sas: check for allocation failure Message-ID: <20130308195839.GL9189@mwanda> References: <20130308120215.GB18712@longonot.mountain> <513A2678.5000803@interlog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <513A2678.5000803@interlog.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 12:57:12PM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > On 13-03-08 07:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > For 32 bytes, why not use the stack? > It's a good point. I'll resend on Monday. regards, dan carpenter