From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753247Ab3CJVj2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:39:28 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:62151 "EHLO mail-pb0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331Ab3CJVj0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:39:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:40:09 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Ming Lei , Tommi Rantala , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Guo Chao , Tejun Heo , LKML , Dave Jones Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! Message-ID: <20130310214009.GB5445@kroah.com> References: <20130308204113.GA15334@kroah.com> <20130310164102.GD4392@kroah.com> <87r4jnouwv.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4jnouwv.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 01:35:12PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:53:11PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Tommi Rantala wrote: > >> > [ 40.089036] [] sysfs_get_dirent+0x39/0x80 > >> > [ 40.089036] [] sysfs_remove_group+0x29/0x100 > >> > [ 40.089036] [] blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x14/0x20 > >> > [ 40.089036] [] blk_unregister_queue+0x5e/0x90 > >> > [ 40.089036] [] del_gendisk+0x107/0x250 > >> > [ 40.089036] [] loop_remove+0x18/0x40 > >> > >> Then the crash is triggered in device release path, which should have > >> been avoided in device add path. > >> > >> If we want to fix the problem completely, add_disk() must handle failure > >> path correctly and return error code on failures, which may involve big > >> work, since add_disk() are called by 50+ drivers. > > > > Ok, but the root problem here is add_disk() is being called to create a > > disk that was already created, right? Surely the caller should have > > detected this before it called to the block core? > > > > Who is calling add_disk() here? Is this a fuse device? If so, then any > > user can trigger this, right? > > > > That should be the "easier" fix at the moment to resolve this issue. > > At first glance this looks like rances in the loop driver. Then that should be easy to fix, only allow one loop device to be created / removed at a time? greg k-h