From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: cleanup partitions when detaching loop device
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:07:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130314150709.056aa4de5fadf3a5e94103d4@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362336553-16880-1-git-send-email-psusi@ubuntu.com>
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 13:49:13 -0500 Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Any partitions added by user space to the loop device were being
> left in place after detaching the loop device. This was because
> the detach path issued a BLKRRPART to clean up partitions if
> LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN was set, meaning that the partitions were auto
> scanned on attach. Replace this BLKRRPART with code that
> unconditionally cleans up partitions on detach instead.
huh. What is the user-visible effect of this bug? Just a memory leak
or something more serious?
If "something more serious", why did this problem remain hidden for so
long?
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1039,12 +1039,24 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
> /* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> - if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
> - ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
> lo->lo_flags = 0;
> if (!part_shift)
> lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + if (bdev)
> + {
scripts/checkpatch.pl is your friend.
Can you please suggest a code comment which we can slip in here to tell
readers what's going on and why we're doing this?
> + struct disk_part_iter piter;
> + struct hd_struct *part;
> +
> + mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1);
> + invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
> + disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk, DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
> + while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> + delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
> + disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-03 18:49 Phillip Susi
2013-03-14 22:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-03-15 1:45 ` Phillip Susi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-02 23:54 Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130314150709.056aa4de5fadf3a5e94103d4@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®