mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST v3.9-rc1] sched: replace PF_THREAD_BOUND with PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:48:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130319204804.GJ3042@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318164715.GC21516@mtj.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:47:15AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:41:40AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > This patch replaces PF_THREAD_BOUND with PF_NO_SETAFFINITY.
> > > sched_setaffinity() checks the flag and return -EINVAL if set.
> > > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() is no longer affected by the flag.
> > > 
> > > This will allow simplifying workqueue worker CPU affinity management.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I suspect you want to carry this in the workqueue tree, to enable those 
> > extra simplifications?
> 
> Yeah, I was planning to pull from one of the -tip branches but if I
> can carry it through the workqueue tree it would be simpler.  Would
> that be okay?

Applying to wq/for-3.10 w/ the rebinding cleanup.  Holler if this
should be routed differently.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130308204518.GR14556@mtj.dyndns.org>
2013-03-14 22:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-18  9:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-18 16:47     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 20:48       ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130319204804.GJ3042@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®