From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v9
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:28:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321112835.GA23567@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362786573-18455-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
> rebased, reviewer-optimized and stripped down to the bare bones
>
> Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
> (full version is git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git hsw/pmu5)
>
> Contains support for:
> - Basic Haswell PMU and PEBS support
> - Late unmasking of the PMI
> - Basic LBRv4 support
>
> v2: Addressed Stephane's feedback. See individual patches for details.
> v3: now even more bite-sized. Qualifier constraints merged earlier.
> v4: Rename some variables, add some comments and other minor changes.
> Add some Reviewed/Tested-bys.
> v5: Address some minor review feedback. Port to latest perf/core
> v6: Add just some variable names, add comments, edit descriptions, some
> more testing, rebased to latest perf/core
> v7: Expand comment
> v8: Rename structure field.
> v9: No wide counters, but add basic LBRs. Add some more
> constraints. Rebase to 3.9rc1
I had another look at your latest patches and they are still quite sloppy:
you never ran them through checkpatch.pl, right? Tons of warnings, quite a
few of which are legitimate.
These are all basic kernel hacking 101 mistakes you commited and we are
already into version 9 of your patch-set ...
Having to point out trivial errors in your patches again and again is not
a very efficient use of my time, frankly.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 23:49 Andi Kleen
2013-03-08 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Add Haswell PEBS record support v4 Andi Kleen
2013-03-08 23:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PMU support v6 Andi Kleen
2013-03-08 23:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PEBS support v4 Andi Kleen
2013-03-08 23:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Move NMI clearing to end of PMI handler after the counter registers are reset Andi Kleen
2013-03-08 23:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Support Haswell v4 LBR format Andi Kleen
2013-03-21 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321112835.GA23567@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome