From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khilman@linaro.org,
geoff@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz1: Documentation
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:00:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321160015.GA10992@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321151811.GR3637@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:18:11AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Actually, this is a generic transformation. Given an English verb,
> you almost always add "ing" to create a noun. Since "round-robin" is
> used as a verb,
... which sounds, in this case, weird IMHO. :-)
> as in "The scheduler will round-robin between the two SCHED_RR
> tasks",
I think the "correct" way to say it is "The scheduler will select tasks
in a round-robin fashion..." But while it is correct (for some accepted
definition of correct), this is slow, has too many words and we don't
want that - we want fast! We want a lot less instructions in the pipe!
This way, we burn a lot less energy when talking. :-)
> "round-robining" may be used as a noun denoting the action
> corresponding to the verb "round-robin". There is no doubt an
> argument as to whether this should be spelled "round-robining" or
> "round-robinning", but I will leave this to those who care enough to
> argue about it. ;-)
Hey sir, you're preaching to the choir - I'm all for doing all kinds of
weird/funny experiments with language...
> The thing about English is that it is an open-source language, and
> always has been. English is defined by its usage, and the wise
> dictionary-makers try their best to keep up.
... yes, and then there are the English language Nazis who wouldn't
allow that - their rules are stricter than software APIs and breaking
userspace compatibility.
Technical people, OTOH, are much more willing and not afraid to take the
language and mold it in such a form so that it works for them instead of
adhering to ancient rules. Which is cool. That's why I was pointing out
the "round-robining" - nice and cool. And look how much shorter it is:
round-robining = iterate over the items on a list by periodically
switching from one to the next in a circular order.
Now imagine the pressure on I$ the two versions create. And compare. :-)
> (The unwise ones attempt to stop the evolution of the English
> language.) Everything good and everything bad about English stems from
> this property. ;-)
Yeah, I've had to deal with enough of those evolution-stopping idiots
during my days at the university. Well, I've got three words for them:
"Resistance is futile!"
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 16:29 Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 18:13 ` Rob Landley
2013-03-18 18:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-18 19:59 ` Rob Landley
2013-03-18 20:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-18 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-20 23:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 23:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 0:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-21 2:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-21 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 16:00 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-03-21 15:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-03-21 17:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 17:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-03-21 18:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-22 18:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-22 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-22 4:59 ` Rob Landley
2013-03-21 18:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-21 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-21 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 18:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-21 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-21 20:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-21 20:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-21 21:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-21 21:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-21 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-22 14:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-22 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-25 14:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-25 14:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-25 15:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-25 15:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-03-22 9:52 ` Mats Liljegren
2013-03-22 19:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-21 18:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-21 18:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-21 19:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-21 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321160015.GA10992@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome