mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:28:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130322112811.GV9382@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514C3C34.4080906@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:10:44PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 06:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> And then have codepaths that nuke shadow pages break from the spinlock,
> >>
> >> I think this is not needed any more. We can let mmu_notify use the generation
> >> number to invalid all shadow pages, then we only need to free them after
> >> all vcpus down and mmu_notify unregistered - at this point, no lock contention,
> >> we can directly free them.
> >>
> >>> such as kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access does now (spin_needbreak).
> >>
> >> BTW, to my honest, i do not think spin_needbreak is a good way - it does
> >> not fix the hot-lock contention and it just occupies more cpu time to avoid
> >> possible soft lock-ups.
> >>
> >> Especially, zap-all-shadow-pages can let other vcpus fault and vcpus contest
> >> mmu-lock, then zap-all-shadow-pages release mmu-lock and wait, other vcpus
> >> create page tables again. zap-all-shadow-page need long time to be finished,
> >> the worst case is, it can not completed forever on intensive vcpu and memory
> >> usage.
> > 
> > Yes, but the suggestion is to use spin_needbreak on the VM shutdown
> > cases, where there is no detailed concern about performance. Such as
> > mmu_notifier_release, kvm_destroy_vm, etc. In those cases what matters
> > most is that host remains unaffected (and that it finishes in a
> > reasonable time).
> 
> Okay. I agree with you, will give a try.
> 
> > 
> >> I still think the right way to fix this kind of thing is optimization for
> >> mmu-lock.
> > 
> > And then for the cases where performance matters just increase a
> > VM global generetion number, zap the roots and then on kvm_mmu_get_page:
> > 
> > kvm_mmu_get_page() {
> > 	sp = lookup_hash(gfn)
> > 	if (sp->role = role) {
> > 		if (sp->mmu_gen_number != kvm->arch.mmu_gen_number) {
> > 			kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(sp); (no need for TLB flushes as its unreachable)
> > 			kvm_mmu_init_page(sp);
> > 			proceed as if the page was just allocated
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > }
> > 
> > It makes the kvm_mmu_zap_all path even faster than you have now.
> > I suppose this was your idea correct with the generation number correct?
> 
> Wow, great minds think alike, this is exactly what i am doing. ;)
> 
Not that I disagree with above code, but why not make mmu_gen_number to be
part of a role and remove old pages in kvm_mmu_free_some_pages() whenever
limit is reached like we looks to be doing with role.invalid pages now.
 
--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-20  8:30 Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_cache->pte_list_descs Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: introduce memslot_set_lpage_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: x86: introduce kvm_clear_all_gfn_page_info Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: MMU: delete shadow page from hash list in kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-21 13:14   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22  2:16     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-20  8:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: MMU: drop unnecessary kvm_reload_remote_mmus after kvm_mmu_zap_all Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-21 22:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-22  2:11   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 10:01     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 10:54     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-22 11:10       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 11:28         ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-22 11:39           ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 11:47             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22 12:03               ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 12:12                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-22 12:37                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-22 19:15                     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-17 20:39                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-04-18  9:42                         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-18 14:01                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-04-18 16:36                             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-18 17:34                               ` Marcelo Tosatti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-20  8:29 Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130322112811.GV9382@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome