From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756685Ab3CYBUJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:20:09 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:34139 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756351Ab3CYBQg (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:16:36 -0400 Message-Id: <20130325010527.622745385@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:05:58 +0000 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Vlad Yasevich , Karl Heiss , Neil Horman , "David S. Miller" Subject: [ 034/104] sctp: Use correct sideffect command in duplicate cookie handling Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130325010524.240972766@decadent.org.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:f137:78a:b654:affb X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Vlad Yasevich [ Upstream commit f2815633504b442ca0b0605c16bf3d88a3a0fcea ] When SCTP is done processing a duplicate cookie chunk, it tries to delete a newly created association. For that, it has to set the right association for the side-effect processing to work. However, when it uses the SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC command, that performs more work then really needed (like hashing the associationa and assigning it an id) and there is no point to do that only to delete the association as a next step. In fact, it also creates an impossible condition where an association may be found by the getsockopt() call, and that association is empty. This causes a crash in some sctp getsockopts. The solution is rather simple. We simply use SCTP_CMD_SET_ASOC command that doesn't have all the overhead and does exactly what we need. Reported-by: Karl Heiss Tested-by: Karl Heiss CC: Neil Horman Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich Acked-by: Neil Horman Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c index 891f5db..cb1c430 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c @@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, } /* Delete the tempory new association. */ - sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc)); + sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_SET_ASOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc)); sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, SCTP_NULL()); /* Restore association pointer to provide SCTP command interpeter