From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757114Ab3CYM25 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:28:57 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:63548 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756439Ab3CYM2z (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:28:55 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,905,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="218587364" Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:28:51 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ley Foon Tan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: of_serial: Handle hw-flow-control property Message-ID: <20130325122851.GB20052@xps8300> References: <1364211286-31611-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1364211286-31611-4-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <201303251140.31866.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201303251140.31866.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:40:31AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 25 March 2013, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > This will add support for hardware flow control. It is > > limited to be used only with 8250 driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus > > Does this imply that we can use hardware flow control only when this > flag is set in the device tree? I assumed that working flow control > would be the default. Is it not? OK, the commit message is wrong. Is the patch otherwise OK? -- heikki