From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935019Ab3CZQMc (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:12:32 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:39895 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934929Ab3CZQLY (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:11:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20130326.121121.1096078537955549879.davem@davemloft.net> To: kapranoff@inbox.ru Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, joe@perches.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: Elimination the forced speed reduction algorithm. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1364309792.2874.2.camel@kkk.nita.ru> References: <1364304872-6408-1-git-send-email-kapranoff@inbox.ru> <1364309792.2874.2.camel@kkk.nita.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kirill Kapranov Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:56:32 +0400 > Does the absence of criticism mean that this patch is ready for > upstream? You were given feedback on coding style, did you address and fix these issues in the submission you made today?