mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: fix sparse error on RCU assignment
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:34:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328193412.GA10116@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130315174240.GA1069@redhat.com>

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/14, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On 03/10, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This fixes the following sparse error when using
> > > > CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER=y and "make C=2 fs/eventpoll.o"
> > > >
> > > >   fs/eventpoll.c:514:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
> > >
> > > ep_remove_wait_queue() does rcu_dereference(pwq->whead) and
> > > rcu_dereference_sparse(__rcu) complains, I guess.
> > >
> > > > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct eppoll_entry {
> > > >  	wait_queue_t wait;
> > > >
> > > >  	/* The wait queue head that linked the "wait" wait queue item */
> > > > -	wait_queue_head_t *whead;
> > > > +	wait_queue_head_t __rcu *whead;
> > >
> > > Well, perhaps this change is fine... but otoh this this a bit misleading.
> > > It is not actually __rcu. The special case is sighand->signalfd_wqh, and
> > > the commemt in ep_remove_wait_queue() means: if ->whead is not stable then
> > > we can only race with signalfd_cleanup(), and rcu_read_lock() ensures this
> > > memory can't go away.
> > >
> > > We do not even need smp_read_barrier_depends() here, ACCESS_ONCE() should
> > > be enough.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it would be better to simply shut up this warning somehow...
> >
> > Hi, I've been hoping others would give a reply and offer a better
> > solution than min.
> 
> Me too ;)
> 
> OK, probably we should use your patch, although personally I'd prefer
> to simply shut up the warning, say
> 
> 	- whead = rcu_dereference(pwq->whead);
> 	+ whead = rcu_dereference((void __rcu*)pwq->whead);

I just tried the above and it does not build:

$ make C=2 fs/eventpoll.o
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'.
  CHK     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
  CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CHECK   scripts/mod/empty.c
  CHECK   fs/eventpoll.c
fs/eventpoll.c:516:17: error: not addressable
  CC      fs/eventpoll.o
fs/eventpoll.c: In function ‘ep_remove_wait_queue’:
fs/eventpoll.c:516: error: lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand
make[1]: *** [fs/eventpoll.o] Error 1
make: *** [fs/eventpoll.o] Error 2

> > Without my proposed patch, sparse _errors_ out on me,
> 
> it is only sparse...
> 
> But OK, I won't argue with you patch.

Thanks.  I think my patch is the best way to address the issue and help
prevent myself from introducing new bugs while working on epoll.

I will continue to wait for comments from others.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-10 11:35 Eric Wong
2013-03-10 18:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-14  2:45   ` Eric Wong
2013-03-15 17:42     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-28 19:34       ` Eric Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130328193412.GA10116@dcvr.yhbt.net \
    --to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome