From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfsd tree related)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:38:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403073857.78c2a24f@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130403113301.GA13951@fieldses.org>
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:33:01 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:10:54AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:42:19 +1100
> > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > fs/built-in.o: In function `nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show':
> > > super.c:(.text+0x87308): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > >
> > > Probably caused by commit 187da2f90879 ("nfsd: keep track of the max and
> > > average time to search the cache") which adds a divide by u64
> > > (num_searches).
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit and the following one for today.
> >
> > Thanks, known problem...
> >
> > Looks like Bruce's tree has an older version of that patch series. I
> > think we just need to get him to drop that one and merge the new one.
>
> Arrgh, sorry--could you remind me which is the new one?
>
It was the one I sent on 3/19. Those patches (plus a couple more) are
also in the current nfsd-3.10 branch of my git tree too, so it may be
easiest to just pick them from there.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 6:42 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03 11:10 ` Jeff Layton
2013-04-03 11:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-03 11:38 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-04-03 18:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-03 18:16 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130403073857.78c2a24f@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®