From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935947Ab3DIJGJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:06:09 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:33420 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935487Ab3DIJGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:06:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:06:05 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, Jean Delvare , Andy Shevchenko , Christian Ruppert Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint Message-ID: <20130409090605.GC28509@the-dreams.de> References: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote: > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the > adapter numbers it preferred. > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes.