From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/11] clockevents: Prefer CPU local devices over global devices
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:33:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409103303.GV23725@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365456453-16297-2-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Hi Stephen,
Apologies for my lack of response on the last version of this.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:27:23PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On an SMP system with only one global clockevent and a dummy
> clockevent per CPU we run into problems. We want the dummy
> clockevents to be registered as the per CPU tick devices, but
> we can only achieve that if we register the dummy clockevents
> before the global clockevent or if we artificially inflate the
> rating of the dummy clockevents to be higher than the rating
> of the global clockevent. Failure to do so leads to boot
> hangs when the dummy timers are registered on all other CPUs
> besides the CPU that accepted the global clockevent as its tick
> device and there is no broadcast timer to poke the dummy
> devices.
>
> If we're registering multiple clockevents and one clockevent is
> global and the other is local to a particular CPU we should
> choose to use the local clockevent regardless of the rating of
> the device. This way, if the clockevent is a dummy it will take
> the tick device duty as long as there isn't a higher rated tick
> device and any global clockevent will be bumped out into
> broadcast mode, fixing the problem described above.
It might be worth pointing out that if dummy timers are only registered
when there's more than one CPU, UP behaviour won't degrade from the
current state of affairs.
>
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-common.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> index b1600a6..9ea59b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> @@ -251,9 +251,10 @@ static int tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
> !(newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT))
> goto out_bc;
> /*
> - * Check the rating
> + * Check the rating, but prefer CPU local devices
> */
> - if (curdev->rating >= newdev->rating)
> + if (curdev->rating >= newdev->rating &&
> + cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask))
> goto out_bc;
> }
This looks good to me. I tested this on a TC2 with a v3.9-rc6 kernel
without architected timer support. The patch restores the ability to use
the sp804 as a broadcast source.
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
If possible I think this should sit in -next for a bit to make sure it
doesn't have any unexpected side effects.
Otherwise, results of testing below.
Without this patch (where boot hangs), magic sysrq show-all-timers give
me the following:
Tick Device: mode: 1
Broadcast device
Clock Event Device: <NULL>
tick_broadcast_mask: 0000000e
tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000
Tick Device: mode: 1
Per CPU device: 0
Clock Event Device: v2m-timer0
max_delta_ns: 4294966591000
min_delta_ns: 14999
mult: 2147484
shift: 31
mode: 3
next_event: 18340000000 nsecs
set_next_event: sp804_set_next_event
set_mode: sp804_set_mode
event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt
retries: 0
Tick Device: mode: 0
Per CPU device: 1
Clock Event Device: dummy_timer
max_delta_ns: 0
min_delta_ns: 0
mult: 1
shift: 0
mode: 1
next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs
set_next_event: <00000000>
set_mode: broadcast_timer_set_mode
event_handler: tick_handle_periodic
retries: 0
[...]
With this patch (where boot succeeds), show-all-timers gives me the following:
Tick Device: mode: 0
Broadcast device
Clock Event Device: v2m-timer0
max_delta_ns: 4294966591000
min_delta_ns: 14999
mult: 2147484
shift: 31
mode: 2
next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs
set_next_event: sp804_set_next_event
set_mode: sp804_set_mode
event_handler: tick_handle_periodic_broadcast
retries: 0
tick_broadcast_mask: 0000000f
tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000
Tick Device: mode: 0
Per CPU device: 0
Clock Event Device: dummy_timer
max_delta_ns: 0
min_delta_ns: 0
mult: 1
shift: 0
mode: 1
next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs
set_next_event: <pK-error>
set_mode: broadcast_timer_set_mode
event_handler: tick_handle_periodic
retries: 0
Tick Device: mode: 0
Per CPU device: 1
Clock Event Device: dummy_timer
max_delta_ns: 0
min_delta_ns: 0
mult: 1
shift: 0
mode: 1
next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs
set_next_event: <pK-error>
set_mode: broadcast_timer_set_mode
event_handler: tick_handle_periodic
retries: 0
[...]
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 21:27 [PATCHv4 00/11] Remove ARM local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 01/11] clockevents: Prefer CPU local devices over global devices Stephen Boyd
2013-04-09 10:33 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-04-09 16:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 02/11] clocksource: add generic dummy timer driver Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 03/11] ARM: smp: Remove duplicate dummy timer implementation Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 04/11] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 05/11] ARM: OMAP2+: Divorce " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 06/11] ARM: EXYNOS4: Divorce mct " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 07/11] ARM: PRIMA2: Divorce timer-marco " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 08/11] ARM: msm: Divorce msm_timer " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 09/11] clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Fix sparse warning Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 10/11] clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Divorce from local timer API Stephen Boyd
2013-04-08 21:27 ` [PATCHv4 11/11] ARM: smp: Remove " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-17 20:44 ` [PATCHv4 00/11] Remove ARM " Stephen Boyd
2013-04-18 16:39 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409103303.GV23725@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®