From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:42:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130421014241.GC19097@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171EA24.3070001@huawei.com>
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 09:06:44AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I was trying to fix a bug: before moving tasks out of empty cpusets,
> update_tasks_nodemask() is called, which calls do_migrate_pages(xx, from, to)
> finally, from == node_to_be_offlined, to == empty_nodeamsk, so I guess
> no pages will be migrated.
>
> Then when those tasks are moving to an ancestor, do_migrate_pages(xx, from, to)
> is called again, from == empty_nodemask, to == ancestor's nodemask,
> so I guess again no pages will be migrated.
Oh, I see. I was a bit confused by the description. Maybe include
the above?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-21 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 12:25 [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 1:06 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-21 1:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets Li Zefan
2013-04-19 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 1:22 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-21 1:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpuset: allow to move tasks to " Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130421014241.GC19097@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome