mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct sk_filter.
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:26:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426122601.10ec05fcb4860df1b0a5b409@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3592414.M8kQZLCXlW@wuerfel>

On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:04:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 19:27:08 Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue:
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> > -void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
> > +static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx)
> >  {
> >         struct jit_ctx ctx;
> >         unsigned tmp_idx;
> > @@ -867,11 +867,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
> >         if (!bpf_jit_enable)
> >                 return;
> >  
> > -       memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
> > -       ctx.skf         = fp;
> > +       ctx = *out_ctx;
> >         ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1;
> >  
> > -       ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.prog_len + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         if (ctx.offsets == NULL)
> >                 return;
> >  
> > @@ -921,13 +920,26 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
> >                 print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "BPF JIT code: ",
> >                                DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 4, ctx.target,
> >                                alloc_size, false);
> > -
> > -       fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
> >  out:
> >         kfree(ctx.offsets);
> > +
> > +       *out_ctx = ctx;
> >         return;
> 
> This part of the patch, in combination with 79617801e "filter: bpf_jit_comp:
> refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output" is now causing build errors
> in linux-next:
> 
> arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function '__bpf_jit_compile':
> arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:930:16: error: 'fp' undeclared (first use in this function)
>    bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target);

Thanks, I did this.  There may be a smarter way...

--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c~arm-net-bpf_jit-make-code-generation-less-dependent-on-struct-sk_filter-fix
+++ a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue:
 }
 
 
-static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx)
+static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp, struct jit_ctx *out_ctx)
 {
 	struct jit_ctx ctx;
 	unsigned tmp_idx;
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *f
 	ctx.prog_len = fp->len;
 	ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns;
 
-	__bpf_jit_compile(&ctx);
+	__bpf_jit_compile(fp, &ctx);
 	if (ctx.target)
 		fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
 }
_


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24 17:27 [PATCH V3] Support for JIT in Seccomp BPF filters Nicolas Schichan
2013-04-24 17:27 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] seccomp: add generic code for jitted seccomp filters Nicolas Schichan
2013-04-24 17:27 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct sk_filter Nicolas Schichan
2013-04-24 17:41   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 14:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-26 19:26     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-04-26 19:47       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 20:09         ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-26 22:01           ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 22:18             ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 22:30               ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 23:33               ` David Miller
2013-04-24 17:27 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit: add support for jitted seccomp filters Nicolas Schichan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426122601.10ec05fcb4860df1b0a5b409@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mgherzan@gmail.com \
    --cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®