From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, neilb@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
jmoyer@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, vgoyal@redhat.com,
stephenmcameron@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: Add new generic block device naming interface
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:03:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426190327.GC1433@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130425221220.GM7917@beardog.cce.hp.com>
hey,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:12:20PM -0500, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> It looks like these are called from a function called init_device_map()
> that is called from grub_stage2() at least in the version of grub I looked
> at (0.97, from rhel6).
>
> So my assumption is that adding a new block driver with yet another name space
> would require adding another bit of code into grub like those above. When I
> asked about "best practices" for new block driver device names on the grub devel
> mailing list to minimize required changes to grub, nobody argued against that
> assumption.
I think we kinda need to get down to the root cause of the issue.
Nothing against giving common names to devices in itself but there's a
non-insigificant chance that we end up with something half-way if the
original problem isn't properly understodd.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-25 20:22 Stephen M. Cameron
2013-04-25 20:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-25 21:07 ` scameron
2013-04-25 21:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-25 22:12 ` scameron
2013-04-26 19:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-04-29 14:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-29 15:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-29 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-28 16:18 Stephen M. Cameron
2013-03-11 19:00 Stephen M. Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130426190327.GC1433@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=stephenmcameron@gmail.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome