From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 08:37:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506083759.556dac76@chukar.edge2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506123805.GA1602@redhat.com>
On Mon, 6 May 2013 14:38:06 +0200 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > I bisected the problem to:
> >
> > commit 1672c0e31917f49d31d30d79067103432bc20cc7
> > What more information is needed from me? I may still mess around
> > with trying to revert that patch just to nail it down for sure, but
> > two separate bisection exercises ended up at the same place.
>
> Below patch should restore old mac80211 behaviour, by stop
> telling mac that 4965 supports TX ACK status. Does it help?
Yup, that fixed the problem, thanks. So did reverting Johannes's
commit above, fwiw, but just turning off that flag in 3.9 as your patch
does fixes it.
seems like that needs to head to Linus and the stable folks ...
jake
--
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 20:38 Jake Edge
2013-05-06 12:38 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 14:37 ` Jake Edge [this message]
2013-05-06 15:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 15:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:44 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 8:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 8:46 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-07 13:53 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:35 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 16:07 ` [PATCH 3.10] iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-22 11:59 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-24 20:28 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:21 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:24 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:29 ` Jake Edge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130506083759.556dac76@chukar.edge2.net \
--to=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®