From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757776Ab3EJP2E (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2013 11:28:04 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51154 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757398Ab3EJP2B (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2013 11:28:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 08:28:00 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/73] 3.9.2-stable review Message-ID: <20130510152800.GA11798@kroah.com> References: <20130509222526.480204972@linuxfoundation.org> <1368199414.4694.3.camel@lorien> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368199414.4694.3.camel@lorien> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:23:34PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 15:24 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.2 release. > > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat May 11 22:23:28 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.2-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.77, 3.4.44, 3.8.12, and 3.9.1 > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5: > (3.4.45-rc1, 3.8.13-rc1, and 3.9.2-rc1) > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics: > (3.0.78-rc1, 3.4.45-rc1, 3.8.13-rc1, and 3.9.2-rc1) > > dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the previous > dmesgs for each of these releases. Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting us know. greg k-h