From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: "djbw@fb.com" <djbw@fb.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: dmatest regression in 3.10-rc1
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:18:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130517141857.GM23112@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130517123423.GR14863@intel.com>
Hi Vinod,
Thanks for the reply.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:35:53PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Right, so I think I understand what's causing this, but I'll leave it to
> > Andriy to suggest a fix. The problem comes about because the dmatest
> > module is now driven from debugfs, making it possible to unload the module
> > whilst a test run is in progress. In this case:
> >
> > - The DMA threads will return from wait_event_freezable_timeout(...)
> > due to kthread_should_stop() returning true, and subsequently
> > report failure because done.done is false.
> >
> > - The DMA engines may not be idle, so the asynchronous callback can
> > be invoked after we've started cleaning up, explaining the NULL
> > dereference I'm seeing.
> >
> > The solutions are either fixing the module exit code to cope with concurrent
> > DMA transfers or to revert 77101ce578bb and not allow the channel threads to
> > return mid-transfer.
> We need to properly abort the channels on removal. This is already handled in
> the code but the kthread_stop is called after the transactions are aborted. It
> should be the other way round. Can you try with below patch
Unfortunately, I can trigger the exact same panic with this patch applied.
Isn't there a race between terminating the dmaengine transfers
(dmaengine_terminate_all) and killing the test threads (kthread_stop) where
a new transfer could be kicked off by dmatest_func?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-15 15:28 Will Deacon
2013-05-16 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-17 12:34 ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-17 14:18 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-05-20 7:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-20 9:58 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-21 12:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 12:33 ` [PATCH] dmatest: abort transfers immediately when asked for Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 15:11 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-21 17:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-22 12:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-22 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-23 10:09 ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-23 10:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-23 10:22 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130517141857.GM23112@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=djbw@fb.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®