From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/posix_acl.h: need 'return NULL' when BUG(), if neither CONFIG_BUG nor HAVE_ARCH_BUG is defined.
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:59:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521105959.GZ18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519AD33D.1030106@asianux.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:51:57AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 12:31 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Seriously? The correct fix it would seem is to give a useful default BUG
> >> definition. Say *NULL.
> >
> > Absolutely.
> >
> > The real question is... how is this happening. I've seen it occasionally
> > in the randconfig builds - though I don't have any logs to hand which
> > show that in the build system at the moment. So, looking at the files:
> >
>
> Maybe it is my fault for the incorrect configuration.
>
> My operation:
> make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm randconfig
> make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm menuconfig
> set 'arm-linux-gnu-' as cross compiler prefix.
> select "MMU-based Paged Memory" in "System Type".
> select "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110" in "ARM System type"
> make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm
> ...
>
> In menuconfig, I do not touch the "S5PV210 Machines" or "S5PC110
> Machines" in "System Type", and no machines will be chosen as default.
You know, telling us that you're using a random configuration to produce
a problem and not providing the actual configuration file is utterly
insane. How many iterations do you think it might take to generate a
random configuration which shows the same problem you're seeing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-20 8:16 Chen Gang
2013-05-20 14:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-20 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-21 1:51 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-21 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-05-21 11:16 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130521105959.GZ18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ben@fluff.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®