From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linus.walleij@linaro.org,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <linux-arm@overkiz.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup (pinctrl macros, defconfigs) for 3.11 #1
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:47:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528054701.GB18476@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519F9116.8060109@atmel.com>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:11:02PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 16:02, Nicolas Ferre :
> >Arnd, Olof,
> >
> >Here is the first AT91 cleanup pull-request for 3.11. I is dominated by a big
> >update of DT files because of the move to macros in pinctrl. As we plan to
> >make this "cleanup" series the base of all our work on AT91 for 3.11, we would
> >like to see it appearing early in arm-soc and linux-next: this is why we send
> >it to you right now.
> >
> >We have colected the Acked-by from Linus Walleij and we all think that it makes
> >sense to merge this material through arm-soc tree:
> >- is touches nearly nothing of pinctrl actual code (a header file)
> >- all dtsi/dts modifications for 3.11 will need this as a codebase for avoiding
> > merging nightmare
> >
> >I hope that it is okay with you.
> >
> >Thanks, best regards,
> >
> >The following changes since commit f722406faae2d073cc1d01063d1123c35425939e:
> >
> > Linux 3.10-rc1 (2013-05-11 17:14:08 -0700)
> >
> >are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
>
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> After having sent the second "fixes" pull-request to you, I want to
> warn you about merging conflicts concerning this "cleanup"
> pull-request for 3.11.
>
> 2 merging conflicts are appearing when placing the "cleanup" branch
> on top of the "fixes" material contained today in at91-fixes tag.
> To address this, I have pushed a resolution branch on our usual git tree:
>
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git at91-3.11-cleanup1+resolved
>
> In case of any question, please let me know. If you want me to
> rebase the original tag that I've sent you, I can do it as well.
Hi,
Thanks, not a big deal for us to resolve so that's ok.
Pulled in the branch. Some comments below:
> >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >Big update with pinctrl by use of macros and
> >header files. Increases readability and avoid
> >typos.
> >Update of AT91 defconfigs and merge of defconfigs for
> >SoC look-alike:
> >sam9260/9g20 and sam9261/9g10.
This is hard to follow, please structure them better in the future.
> >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (6):
> > ARM: at91: dt: use #include for all device trees
> > ARM: at91: dt: switch to standard GPIO flag defines.
> > ARM: at91: dt: add pinctrl pre-processor define
> > ARM: at91: dt: switch to pinctrl to pre-processor
> > ARM: at91: dt: switch to standard IRQ flag defines
> > ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs
Typo in the patch subject, please keep an eye on these in the future.
> > arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig | 55 ++-
> > arch/arm/configs/at91rm9200_defconfig | 218 ++-------
> > ...am9g20_defconfig => at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig} | 67 ++-
> > arch/arm/configs/at91sam9260_defconfig | 91 ----
> > ...am9261_defconfig => at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig} | 19 +-
> > arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263_defconfig | 39 +-
> > arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g45_defconfig | 94 ++--
> > arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 35 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt | 159 +++----
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 2 -
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9261ek.c | 28 +-
> > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h | 35 ++
> > 63 files changed, 1407 insertions(+), 1617 deletions(-)
> > rename arch/arm/configs/{at91sam9g20_defconfig => at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig} (67%)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/at91sam9260_defconfig
> > rename arch/arm/configs/{at91sam9261_defconfig => at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig} (91%)
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h
Good to see consolidation, it'd be awesome if there could be even more.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-28 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-17 14:02 Nicolas Ferre
2013-05-24 16:11 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-05-28 5:47 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2013-05-28 11:02 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130528054701.GB18476@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm@overkiz.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®