From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934416Ab3E1OqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 10:46:00 -0400 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:53040 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934359Ab3E1Op7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 10:45:59 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:46:24 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hwmon fixes for 3.10-rc2 Message-ID: <20130528144624.GA20979@roeck-us.net> References: <20130515133311.GA14411@roeck-us.net> <20130517115640.GA15916@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:25:55AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'm going through my spam-box, and find this. Guenter, I don't know what > you've done to piss off gmail, but you should take a look at your email > setup, because if gmail thinks you send spam, I'll have a hard time ever > seeing your messages (and I don't go through spam very often) > Guess that explains it. Thanks a lot for the note. Too much spam out there lately, and small providers (like mine) get caught in the middle. I tried AT&T / Yahoo, but they tend to reject patch series as spam. So looks like I am caught between a rock and a hard place. On top of that there is Google and its policies, which seem to target small providers; I can not send any e-mail to a Google recipient (anyone@google.com) when using my primary provider. One has to wonder if there is a conflict of interest somewhere. Guenter > Linus > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > > > I noticed that you did not pull this series of patches. > > > > Did it get lost, is something wrong with it, or am I just impatient ? > > > > Thanks, > > Guenter > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:33:11AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > > > > > Please pull hwmon fixes for Linux 3.10-rc2 from signed tag: > > > > > > git:// > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.githwmon-for-linus > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Guenter > > > ------ > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > f722406faae2d073cc1d01063d1123c35425939e: > > > > > > Linux 3.10-rc1 (2013-05-11 17:14:08 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.gittags/hwmon-for-linus > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to ecacb0b17c08fae89f65468727f0e4b8e91da4e1: > > > > > > hwmon: fix error return code in abituguru_probe() (2013-05-13 08:07:13 > > -0700) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Error path fixes for abituguru and iio_hwmon drivers. > > > Drop erroneously created attributes from nct6775 driver. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Axel Lin (2): > > > hwmon: (iio_hwmon) Fix missing iio_channel_release_all call if > > devm_kzalloc fail > > > hwmon: (iio_hwmon) Fix null pointer dereference > > > > > > Guenter Roeck (1): > > > hwmon: (nct6775) Do not create non-existing attributes > > > > > > Wei Yongjun (1): > > > hwmon: fix error return code in abituguru_probe() > > > > > > drivers/hwmon/abituguru.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > > > drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c | 8 +++++--- > > > drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lm-sensors mailing list > > > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org > > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors > > > >