From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966919Ab3E2UeC (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 16:34:02 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50237 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966083Ab3E2Ud4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 16:33:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:33:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Johan Hovold Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Douglas Gilbert , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Ludovic Desroches , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rtc-at91rm9200: add shadow interrupt mask Message-Id: <20130529133354.dd181c845ee4e96527483345@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1369298335-24597-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> References: <1364983415-20298-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> <1369298335-24597-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:38:50 +0200 Johan Hovold wrote: > This is an update of the shadow-interrupt-mask series against v3.10-rc2. > > I guess we need Atmel to confirm that all sam9x5 SoCs are indeed > affected. If not, then some probing mechanism as the one Doug suggested > could be implemented on top of (a subset of) these patches. What do you > say, Nicolas? > > Note that the first patch (adding a missing OF compile guard) could be > applied straight away. At this stage it is unclear to me how to proceed with patches 2-5.