mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, dhowells@redhat.com,
	sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com, swhiteho@redhat.com,
	Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	piastryyy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:17:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130604201759.GB15594@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370056054-25449-6-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:07:28PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers.
> Also move the global list handling out of locks_insert_block, and into
> the caller that ends up triggering it as that allows us to eliminate the
> IS_POSIX check there.

ACK.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index cef0e04..caca466 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -494,13 +494,38 @@ static int posix_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2)
>  	return fl1->fl_owner == fl2->fl_owner;
>  }
>  
> +/* Remove a blocker or lock from one of the global lists */
> +static inline void
> +locks_insert_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
> +{
> +	list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
> +{
> +	list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
> +{
> +	list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
> +{
> +	list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> +}
> +
>  /* Remove waiter from blocker's block list.
>   * When blocker ends up pointing to itself then the list is empty.
>   */
>  static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
>  	list_del_init(&waiter->fl_block);
> -	list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> +	locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter);
>  	waiter->fl_next = NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -524,8 +549,6 @@ static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker,
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_block));
>  	list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block);
>  	waiter->fl_next = blocker;
> -	if (IS_POSIX(blocker))
> -		list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list);
>  }
>  
>  /* Wake up processes blocked waiting for blocker.
> @@ -552,7 +575,7 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
>   */
>  static void locks_insert_lock(struct file_lock **pos, struct file_lock *fl)
>  {
> -	list_add(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
> +	locks_insert_global_locks(fl);
>  
>  	fl->fl_nspid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
>  
> @@ -573,7 +596,7 @@ static void locks_delete_lock(struct file_lock **thisfl_p)
>  
>  	*thisfl_p = fl->fl_next;
>  	fl->fl_next = NULL;
> -	list_del_init(&fl->fl_link);
> +	locks_delete_global_locks(fl);
>  
>  	if (fl->fl_nspid) {
>  		put_pid(fl->fl_nspid);
> @@ -839,6 +862,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
>  				goto out;
>  			error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED;
>  			locks_insert_block(fl, request);
> +			locks_insert_global_blocked(request);
>  			goto out;
>    		}
>    	}
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-01  3:07 [PATCH v1 00/11] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 21:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] locks: make generic_add_lease and generic_delete_lease static Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 21:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 22:00   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 11:09     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 20:17   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 20:17   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] locks: convert to i_lock to protect i_flock list Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:22   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05  0:46     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] locks: only pull entries off of blocked_list when they are really unblocked Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:58   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 11:38     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:24       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 12:38         ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:59           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] locks: convert fl_link to a hlist_node Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 21:59   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-05 11:43     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-05 12:46       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Jeff Layton
2013-06-01  3:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:19   ` Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
2013-06-04 14:39     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-06-04 14:53       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 15:15         ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 14:56       ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-03 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-03 21:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-04 10:54   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-04 11:56     ` Jim Rees
2013-06-04 12:15       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130604201759.GB15594@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=piastryyy@gmail.com \
    --cc=sage@inktank.com \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®