From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751918Ab3FIPQU (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:16:20 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:54074 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931Ab3FIPQS (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:16:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:16:01 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/27] x86, irq: Make dmar_msi/hpet_msi irq_chip name consistent Message-ID: <20130609151601.GB2245@breakpoint.cc> References: <1370644273-10495-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1370644273-10495-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370644273-10495-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > All others are using "-" instead of "_". Who are "all others"? According to my grep it is 121 vs 44. So even without your two here we still 42 doing it the other way around so it is not all. However it might make sense to use _ instead of " " within a chip's name and - as a delimiter for modes like edge or level. However that is way beyond the scope of this patch and I am not sure if anyone finds this usefull at all. Saying this, I am fine with this patch :) Sebastian