mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, walken@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: don't allocate with GFP_KERNEL inside rcu read lock
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:00:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130611150041.18036ca0597e100a1b4fb2a2@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370885029.1795.7.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:23:49 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 12:14 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > ipc_addid() is protected by a rcu read lock, which means we can't allocate
> > using GFP_KERNEL inside it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Another option would be to call idr_preload from outside the read lock,
> > but that complicates the code much more than this fix. If that's the
> > preferred method to fix it I can resend that solution instead.
> > 
> 
> This issue was reported last week by Fengguang
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1545633.html#.UbYI9qqdmV8)
> 
> Your fix looks the simplest approach, but I'm not sure if doing the
> atomic allocation would trigger some other problem, as a side effect.
> Andrew?

It will fix the issue.  But GFP_ATOMIC is much less reliable than
GFP_KERNEL and such a switch should be viewed as a lame act of last
resort.

> A third option would be to simply revert the offending commit, leaving
> the rcu locking as it originally was.

That patch has other issues, as I described yesterday.  But there are
ten follow-on patches to that one and I assume that dropping
ipc-move-rcu-lock-out-of-ipc_addid.patch will create a mess.  It will
also create a combination which hasn't been tested by anyone.


      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 16:14 Sasha Levin
2013-06-10 17:23 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-11 22:00   ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130611150041.18036ca0597e100a1b4fb2a2@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®