From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756113Ab3FQJQm (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:16:42 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:58157 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755757Ab3FQJQk (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:16:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:16:30 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Illia Smyrnov Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Daniel Mack , Matthias Brugger , Tony Lindgren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20130617091630.GZ1403@sirena.org.uk> References: <1371226328-24147-1-git-send-email-illia.smyrnov@ti.com> <1371226328-24147-3-git-send-email-illia.smyrnov@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i/mq3IMNEv8uWibA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371226328-24147-3-git-send-email-illia.smyrnov@ti.com> X-Cookie: Tomorrow, you can be anywhere. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.42.102.178 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] spi: omap2-mcspi: Add FIFO buffer support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --i/mq3IMNEv8uWibA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:12:08PM +0300, Illia Smyrnov wrote: > The MCSPI controller has a built-in FIFO buffer to unload the DMA or interrupt > handler and improve data throughput. This patch adds FIFO buffer support for SPI > transfers in DMA mode. This looks good but doesn't apply against my topic/omap branch - can you please check and resend? Probably something that applies against -next will be fine. --i/mq3IMNEv8uWibA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRvtPqAAoJELSic+t+oim98jgP/RVFzo1lUH8F7aEumfJrjMAn M6C8sli0qJLqDlPsAqctewNnu2E7FDKBUGvTLT+R6z91q7u8QVV0B2ZFwzAWl4wW TYmTYpumFyMn1PhKxeBcoR09QdxWsBxybt0URJPw5+sLzyRmg1o8FckIqanzjnXb yOC0gePj7s6WAymNwRahOnBY+kvUoYhzdbxswsl4HTPJicdjSBIJh2f1YiJkuNnX IAxPtnVsHX9OdJaUZlRGkmnPVa5g0XusXXj+YHJz1VnRYE3/Wm3hWIbbnRlMeEJt //GV3luxJexZbNwen4ihUtv5iXaKSrxP+VtfQjJFPakcSoPyYPkCU4B19ik9qUn4 EzLGqaHAti7+lN5r56Dt9Di/oNJyyyR8nJzfaUcUOYmP0FemHBB2AGo3jJg6IQD3 7AQUCye/28vE6+LMagU3eGJCNSlyQVsIRCqF/k2kTc+kPeuYPTaAtIlB+408qifH OWo681oTHmwj2ok/4Migze+D0d1+3fLC2b9/dNAjxRfCQHSGQEwd52o67wLqsZfn X+Sykutpl+ExQMxbsq0Czj8Tu5apqvvhhF+IMge2Q5QQCdLEhGT9VxWnak82qvNf SChOM+oiux9ilbRtjONlEC1eS+1z25UbmvPhqTEGD6C9R+Vi4NwV6Lj/mNRtET1W hKg0RnDZRlvnegfIGdSo =S+oO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i/mq3IMNEv8uWibA--